Digg’s Signal-to-Noise Ratio Just Too Upside-down For Me
Don’t get me wrong: I like Digg, and Graceful Flavor has had stories on Digg’s front page, mainly on account of many of my stories being Apple/OSX-centric. Digg is an entertaining site, which is different from, say, a truly newsworthy site. I tend to prefer real news sites as I scour my Google Reader for new Graceful Flavor content.
It comes down to one thing — signal:noise ratio, which is more loosely translated into ease of valuable information discovery. Boorrring, I know, but bear with me.
Digg has become a bit too noisy for me, so much so that I sit in front of Google Reader, click over to my Digg feed, and always get astounded at how many times I have to hit “J” to move through all unread items (yes I know you can scroll too, but that’s not the point) that just aren’t interesting to me as a blogger. And that’s for a relatively small timeframe. Digg can be a firehose, and most of the water isn’t as clean as I’d like.
In one sense, Digg has become a sort of an inverse Darwinian popularity contest: certain themes (Apple/OSX, Linux, Xbox 360, PS3, Wii, Gears of War, etc.) garner massive diggs almost immediately, even if their content is light, whereas others don’t, even if they’re truly more newsworthy or substantial than the popular themes. As a result, many popular, topical items make the front page, whereas others (many with excellent credibility) die in the river of the un-dugg. In the purity of information sense, sometimes the weak live and the strong die on Digg.
Digg is neat for when I want to blog about the occasional nuance or tech oddity, but it takes too much work to actually get to real, substantial news.
Maybe it’s how I work. Maybe it’s because I’m a blogger. Because Digg is an excellent site for general browsing. Maybe that’s the rub. But for someone who consumes the content of dozens of sites a day, Digg’s flood of items — many of which are of questionable substance — well, it just gets a bit tedious.
Am I in the minority in feeling this way? I know that Robert Scoble echoed similar sentiments a while back, but his post was before I began GF in earnest, so I lacked the blogger context of what he was talking about. Now I know, and now I agree.
What about you? Are you a serious blogger who finds Digg to be a valuable feed day after day? Or are you like me, finding Techmeme and Tailrank much better in terms of signal:noise?
FYI: I haven’t yet unsubscribed my Digg feed, but I’m considering it. I’d like to hear what other bloggers think.

I absolutely agree. I as search for content ideas for both my webpage and my blog, I find myself turning to Digg less and less for the reasons you articulate above.
I am definitley a big fan of Tailrank.
TMM
I have grown tired of the inflamatory campers who have turned up the noise on Digg.
One of my readers pointed me to beta.NewsTrust.net which I find interesting both as a reader and in the reviews of articles I’ve written that are ranked there.
Dan — I agree. I’ve followed the whole RDM vs. Digg thing at a cursory level. I’m no expert.
I’ll check out beta.newstrust.net. Thanks for the heads-up.
TMM — be sure you check out Techmeme too.
SNR is, IMHO, the biggest issue facing blogs and collaborative information-sharing sites like Wikpedia. The ratio is high, but, sadly, often favouring the N over the S.
It’s somewhat like the WordPress Dashboard’s “Latest posts” vs “Top posts”. Latest ¬ best. Come to think of it, neither does top…
Like the new avatar BTW.
Michael — I think WP Dashboard’s “latest posts” are pretty noisy: they’re just spawned by one metric: time, or recentness. The top posts are a BIT bitter, but they suffer from the same thing Digg does: popularity-contest syndrome. The other day, three or four of the “top posts” were about Britney’s faux pas shots. Nice.